Absolute freedom.
A common demand by every one of us, but how much do we really want it?
And if everyone wants it why is our society based upon the lack of it.
According to the American Heritage dictionary it is: The condition of being free of restrains. The capacity to exercise choice; free will.
Two people, living in the same place, can never be free. Society, human interaction is what limits our freedom.
But, we are social beings, at least according to Aristotle.
Freedom is a Myth.
Ever since man created societies there has been none, ever.
"While the State exists, there can be no freedom. When there is freedom there will be no State."
Living in a society, any kind of society, be it a family, a school or a community, is not possible without the compromise of our freedom. Everything we say, everything we do is controlled and limited for the good of others and ourselves.
Laws were established after all to serve society. Law is an agreement, in which we compromise and limit our freedom in order for everyone to do the same and therefore protect ourselves from others. Since laws are then the foundation of our society, then our society is based upon a compromise of our freedom.
Let’s look at an everyday example. Fashion.
Fashion is another aspect through which we can realize even rather simplistically the torment of absolute freedom.
Imagine entering this huge shop, your choices are indeed infinite. You have no limitations. How would you feel? Excited? Take a second to think about it. My guess is that were it not for fashion’s do’s and don’t ‘s you would be lost in that chaos. What would you base your choice on? Taste? Who do you think forms that taste? Isn’t it society?
Because we live in a society, we have the comfort of choosing what is accepted by our group; that is what gives us the reassurance that our choice is approved of by someone else.
Even what you think is limited by society, if your thoughts are immoral or abnormal you are taught to dismiss them yourself, you are taught to consider them sinful and evil.
What freedom then is there? Even in thinking? Shame and morality are the yoke of the minds and souls.
Possibly because we haven’t realized what absolute freedom really is.
Well according to many philosophers, amongst whom Nietzsche holds a prominent position, crime is the only act of freedom.
Crime, breaking the law, is in fact an act against the social group one is a part of, yet at the same time it is the only absolute act of freedom because it is an act that breaks all limitations and restrictions.
Take a moment to consider how Robinson Crusoe might have felt, all alone, well that is before Friday appeared, on a deserted island. He obviously was facing a huge dilemma; he could either build a boat and try to “go home” or stay put and try to make the most out of his situation. In either choice there is a certain amount of risk. Robinson can either die alone on an island or die trying to find his way home; neither of his choices are pleasant.
I believe Crusoe would rather not have to make that choice! Because he is absolutely free, society-wise, but he himself cannot help resenting the fact that he will have to suffer the consequences of his actions while having absolutely no kind of limitation or norm to abide by or anyone to blame. If he could only ask his mother…

1 comments:
Freedom is a Myth. I'm not responsible to the following answer, but I'm in entire agreement to it.
Such a word is nothing more than manifestations of the desires, discontent, and conservativeness of economic classes and deserves no mention outside of the realm of a social human infrastructure because the moment we are man, we are henceforth socially bound and recognized in no other capacity because such a move back would be a fall into backwardness.
Freedom is not a myth but is a word shamelessly and ignorantly placarded-- manipulated, and construed freely according to the epoch of its circulation and the position of the latters economic classes.
In poets, in propaganda-- freedom, i.e., economic interest, is the aim of preservation or attainment of whoever wields the pen or propaganda office.
Post a Comment